if you're anything like me, you're broke with time on your hands. that means one thing and one thing only - you're taking the train home from chicago next week. no delays at midway or o'hare. no airport security. no beverage and peanuts. no sir. you're dedicating 1/2 day to amtrak. and inexplicably happy about it.
here's the thing. i love to move; on foot or buckled into a boeing 747, i dig traveling. i'm constantly curious about how people get from here to there - which modes are most thrilling? relaxing? social? satisfying? efficient?
lately i've been thinking about trains. they seem classy to me. and a bit edgy. occasionally, flammable. and better for the environment than planes?
i realized i wasn't sure. in fact, there's a lot i don't know about trains. so i did a little research. according to this 2007 editorial, when you consider a variety of factors from cost to style points, trains beat out cars and planes for regional u.s. travel. this 2008 new york times article discusses the rising popularity of the eurostar based on its green advantage over planes. this blog tracks a student's cross-country amtrak tour.
out six hours and $20, i'll let you know what i think next week.
I Wrote a Column for Outside and They Published It on the Internet! - I'm currently waiting to board a cross-country New York-bound germ tube as I type this, but my latest column ponders the question all thinking cyclists* ha...